In this article
You might like
No items found.
See the latest spending trends for 25k+ companies on Ramp

Benchmark your company's expenses with Ramp's data.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Spending made smarter
Easy-to-use cards, spend limits, approval flows, vendor payments —plus an average savings of 5%.1
|
4.8 Rating 4.8 rating
Error Message
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Get fresh finance insights, monthly
Time and money-saving tips,
straight to your inbox
|
4.8 Rating 4.8 rating
Thanks for signing up
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Table of contents

For effective procurement and supply chain management, you can use one of the many models available. But the two most popular ones are the source-to-settle model and the procure-to-pay model.

Both the source-to-settle and procure-to-pay models are essential in driving strategic procurement and supply chain optimization. By using either of these models or a combination, you can achieve improved cost savings, risk mitigation, and operational efficiency.

In this article, we’ll dive into the details of what each of these models are, how they differ, and which one might be right for you.

Understanding source-to-settle

The source-to-settle process is a comprehensive framework that encompasses the entire procurement lifecycle, from the identification of sourcing needs to the final settlement of payments.

The source-to-settle process involves a series of interconnected steps, including sourcing, contract management, ordering, receiving, and invoice processing. 

By streamlining and integrating these functions, you can achieve greater visibility, control, and automation throughout the procurement cycle. This can help you reduce the risk of errors and delays, enable more informed decision-making and strategic procurement initiatives.

The source-to-settle model can transform procurement from a transactional function into a strategic driver of business success. By leveraging data-driven insights and automation, you can identify and capitalize on cost-saving opportunities, negotiate better contracts, and ensure compliance with internal policies and external regulations.

Next, let’s look at the benefits of adopting the source-to-settle model for procurement.

Benefits of source-to-settle

By implementing the source-to-settle model for your procurement processes you can:

  • Optimize sourcing and procurement processes, reduce maverick spending, and increase contract compliance. You can also leverage strategic supplier relationships for enhanced buying power.

  • Streamline procurement workflows, automated and digitize your procurement processes, and improve data visibility and reporting capabilities.

  • Proactively identify and resolve contractual and performance issues, improve compliance with internal policies and external regulations, and even mitigate risks arising from the suppliers’ side.

  • Collaborate better with your suppliers, increase transparency and trust with them, and improve supplier performance monitoring and feedback.

  • Make strategic, data-backed procurement decisions based on comprehensive spend analysis, procurement trends, and opportunities for optimization.

  • Foster a culture of innovation and continuous learning through ongoing process optimization, incorporation of stakeholder feedback, and industry best practices.

By implementing the source-to-settle model, you can achieve a more strategic, efficient, and risk-averse procurement function.

But to implement it, you must also understand the key components of the source-to-settle process.

Key components of the source-to-settle process

The key components of the source-to-settle process are:

  1. Strategic sourcing, which you need for spend analysis, category management, and supplier identification, evaluation, and selection. It also aids in the Request for Proposal (RFP) and negotiation processes.
  2. Contract management, for contract creation, approval, storage, access management, performance monitoring, and renewal or termination.
  3. Procurement requisition, which helps with requisition creation and approval, purchase order generation, and supplier order placement.
  4. Goods and services receipt, for goods and services delivery, inspection and acceptance, and also inventory management.
  5. Invoice processing, which is essential for invoice receipt, validation, approval, and payment authorization. It also helps with dispute resolution.
  6. Supplier relationship management, which you need to evaluate supplier performance, collaborate with them, and even for supplier risk management.
  7. Continuous improvement for process optimization, automation, data analysis and reporting, as well as stakeholder feedback and engagement.

These core components of the source-to-settle model work together to maximize supplier relationship value, mitigate procurement-related risks, enhance operational efficiency and cost savings, and foster a culture of continuous improvement and innovation.

Now let’s take a closer look at the procure-to-pay process.

Understanding procure-to-pay

The procure-to-pay process is an end-to-end workflow that encompasses the procurement of goods and services, from the initial request to the final payment. It focuses specifically on the transactional aspects of procurement, covering the steps from purchase requisition to invoice payment.

By streamlining and automating these processes, you can achieve greater efficiency, reduced errors, and improved cash flow management. The procure-to-pay model leverages technology and data-driven insights to optimize purchasing decisions, enhance supplier collaboration, and provide visibility into spending patterns and budgets

The procure-to-pay process centralizes procurement activities and leverages data-driven insights to help you negotiate better terms with suppliers, identify cost-saving opportunities, and ensure compliance with established policies and regulations. It also facilitates better visibility into your organization's spending patterns, allowing for more informed decision-making and strategic resource allocation.

If you’d like to learn more, you can read our detailed guide on procure-to-pay.

Meanwhile, let’s highlight the differences between source-to-settle and procure-to-pay models.

Difference between source-to-settle and procure-to-pay models

The source-to-settle model and the procure-to-pay model are two distinct approaches to managing the procurement and payment processes. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two models.

Procurement Comparison Table
Source-to-settle Procure-to-pay
Encompasses a broader range of procurement activities, spanning the entire sourcing and procurement lifecycle, from strategic sourcing to supplier management and contract administration. Focuses on the tactical and operational aspects of the procurement process, starting from the requisition of goods or services to the final payment to the supplier.
Places a strong emphasis on strategic procurement, focusing on activities such as supplier identification, evaluation, and selection, as well as contract negotiation and management. Primarily concerned with the efficient and accurate execution of day-to-day procurement transactions, such as purchase order creation, invoice processing, and payment authorization.
Emphasizes the importance of building and maintaining long-term, strategic relationships with suppliers, leveraging their capabilities and expertise to drive value for your organization. Aims to streamline and automate the transactional aspects of the procurement process, with a focus on reducing cycle times, minimizing errors, and improving operational efficiency.
Ensures compliance with organizational policies, regulations, and industry standards throughout the procurement process, with a focus on risk management and governance. Ensures compliance with organizational policies and procedures related to procurement and payment, but with a more tactical and operational perspective.
Promotes a culture of continuous improvement, with a focus on optimizing procurement processes, leveraging data and analytics, and driving innovation. Emphasizes cost control and budget management, with a focus on ensuring that procurement activities are aligned with your organization's financial objectives.

Choosing the right model

When selecting between a source-to-settle and a procure-to-pay approach, here are the key factors to consider:

Procurement Comparison Table
Choose source-to-settle if: Choose procure-to-pay if:
You want to prioritize strategic sourcing, supplier relationship management, and procurement optimization. You want to focus on operational efficiency and financial controls.
You want to achieve cost savings through strategic sourcing and supplier negotiations. You want to save costs by focusing on reducing administrative costs.
You have a mature, centralized procurement function and complex supply chains. If you have a less mature or decentralized procurement environment.
You want to manage a large, diverse supplier base with significant strategic importance. You want to manage a smaller, less complex supplier portfolio.
You have robust spend analytics and business intelligence to support strategic decision-making. You rely more on operational data and transactional insights.
You possess a higher level of analytical capability to derive actionable insights from procurement data. You only have access to less specialized analytical expertise.
You have a comprehensive suite of procurement technologies, such as sourcing, contract management, and supplier management tools. You want a solution that easily integrates with existing enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems.
You are willing to invest significantly in IT resources, integration, and ongoing maintenance. You have a limited budget for investing in IT resources.
You want to involve a broader set of stakeholders, which requires more extensive change management efforts. You want an easier to implement solution with a more focused, centralized procurement team.
You can invest time and effort into getting buy-in from all stakeholders, internal and external, to implement cross-functional collaboration. You have a more decentralized, siloed procurement culture and may find it challenging to implement extensive cross-functional collaboration.

Advantages of using technology and automation

The integration of technology and automation into the procurement process can provide significant benefits like cost savings, increased efficiency, enhanced visibility and control, risk mitigation, and informed decision making.

Let’s dive into how specifically technology can benefit each of the two models discussed above.

Advantages of technology in source-to-settle

The source-to-settle model can benefit from technology in the following ways:

  • You can optimize supplier contracts and negotiations by leveraging AI-powered supplier identification and evaluation, automated spend analysis, and category management.

  • You can streamline onboarding and off-boarding processes for suppliers through centralized supplier data and performance monitoring, and improved collaboration and communication.

  • You can proactively identify and mitigate supply chain risks through automated compliance checks and controls.

  • You can identify cost-saving opportunities and optimization initiatives by leveraging comprehensive spend analytics, reporting, and predictive insights for strategic decision-making.

Advantages of technology in procure-to-pay

Using technology can enhance the procure-to-pay model in these ways:

  • Reduce manual interventions and processing times via automated procurement workflows and approvals, and real-time tracking of purchase orders and invoices.

  • Improve compliance with internal policies and external regulations stemming from the tight integration with financial systems and ERP, and robust approval processes and audit trails.

  • Streamline supplier communication and information sharing, as well as implement supplier self-service capabilities for invoicing and payments.

  • Gain the ability to make informed, data-driven procurement decisions via comprehensive procurement data and analytics, which give you insights into spend patterns, trends, and optimization opportunities.

While both the source-to-settle and procure-to-pay processes benefit from technology and automation, the advantages tend to be more strategic in nature for the source-to-settle process, focusing on sourcing, supplier management, and business intelligence.

In contrast, the advantages of technology in the procure-to-pay process are more operational, centered on improving efficiency, financial controls, and data-driven decision-making.

But irrespective of the model you choose, an all-in-one procurement solution like Ramp can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of your procurement processes. From  automated approval flows, vendor management, spend visibility and controls, and instant insights, Ramp can contribute to improved financial performance, risk management, and overall operational efficiency. Check out Ramp today.

Try Ramp for free
Error Message
 
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Group Manager of Product Marketing, Ramp
Chris Sumida is the Group Manager of Product Marketing at Ramp, located in Ladera Ranch, California. With almost a decade in product marketing, Chris has a knack for leading successful teams and strategies. At Ramp, he’s been a driving force behind the launch of Ramp Procurement, which makes procurement easier and more efficient for businesses. Before joining Ramp, Chris worked at Xero and LeaseLabs®️, creating and implementing marketing plans. He kicked off his career at Chef’s Roll, Inc. Chris also mentors up-and-coming talent through the Aztec Mentor Program. He graduated from San Diego State University with a BA in Political Science.
Ramp is dedicated to helping businesses of all sizes make informed decisions. We adhere to strict editorial guidelines to ensure that our content meets and maintains our high standards.

FAQs

Don't miss these

No items found.

How Precision Neuroscience streamlined systems and slashed data entry with Ramp

"Ramp’s OCR has been so useful on the procurement side. It automatically takes all the information from the quote and saves all the data entry that we would have otherwise had to type into a purchase order.”
Brian Lautenbach, Financial Controller, Precision Neuroscience

How Liquid Measurement Systems reduced fraud, improved UX, and drove efficiency with Ramp

“Because people can do their own receipts so easily and code in real-time, our accountant has minimal work to do at the end of the month."
Sarah Paxman-Bean, Director of Finance & IT, Liquid Measurement Systems

How Pair Eyewear consolidated systems, enhanced efficiency, and refocused resources with Ramp

“We love NetSuite and Ramp together. It’s like they’re long lost cousins and they’ve come back together. It’s like they were built for each other.”
Staci Robinson, AP Manager, Pair Eyewear

How Skin Pharm streamlined approvals, improved procurement workflow, and leveled up its team with Ramp

"I'm able to get the most out of my team with Ramp, Anna just got promoted from analyst to manager because she doesn't need to spend her time doing these manual processes anymore, she can focus on more strategic work."
Kaela Patrinely, VP of Finance, Skin Pharm

How Ramp helped Quora’s finance team streamline operations, simplify AP, and stay lean

“With Ramp's automation, I actually have the time to think about how to improve things, how to make things more efficient, how to make things better for employees."
Richard Gobea, Finance Manager, Quora

How Ramp helped Apprentice.io modernize accounting with automation

“I saw a quote about how the cost of inaction now outweighs the cost of modernizing finance. If you don’t modernize now, what will it cost you in the future? ”
Oscar Lobo, Controller, Apprentice.io

How Ramp helped Zola do more with less

“We’re trying to get into a good rhythm of closing the books within 10-12 days, and Ramp has been a huge, huge lifesaver and time saver for us.”
Joe Horn, VP Controller, Zola