Supplier audit: Definition, types, and how to conduct one

- What is a supplier audit?
- Why supplier audits matter
- Who conducts a supplier audit?
- Types of supplier audits
- How to conduct a supplier audit, step-by-step
- Common issues found during a supplier audit
- How to mitigate a failed supplier audit
- Enhance your procurement process with Ramp

A supplier audit evaluates a vendor’s facilities, operations, and processes to confirm they meet your quality, contractual, and regulatory requirements. Neglecting to perform thorough audits can lead to quality issues, delivery delays, and even legal problems, all of which can damage your business's reputation and bottom line.
What is a supplier audit?
A supplier audit is a systematic evaluation of a vendor’s facilities, operations, and processes to verify compliance with quality standards, contractual requirements, and industry regulations.
Supplier audits often involve on-site visits, document reviews, interviews with personnel, and direct observation of operations. They may be conducted before onboarding a new supplier (prequalification audit), at regular intervals (routine audit), or in response to performance issues (for-cause audit).
The main objectives are to confirm quality and consistency, ensure compliance with regulatory and contractual requirements, identify risks in the supply chain, and strengthen collaboration with vendors.
The terms “supplier audit” and “vendor audit” are often used interchangeably. In some contexts, supplier audits emphasize production and quality processes, while vendor audits focus more broadly on vendor compliance and financial considerations.
Why supplier audits matter
Supplier audits strengthen your supply chain by ensuring consistency, compliance, and accountability. Benefits include:
- Quality assurance: Confirm that suppliers meet agreed quality standards, helping you maintain product consistency and reliability
- Risk mitigation: Spot risks early to prevent production delays, defects, and reputational damage
- Regulatory compliance: Ensure suppliers meet legal and industry requirements, reducing exposure to penalties or lawsuits
- Efficiency improvements: Identify bottlenecks or inefficiencies that drive up costs
- Customer satisfaction: Ensure suppliers deliver reliably so you can reduce complaints and returns
- Continuous improvement: Encourage transparent communication and establish benchmarks for long-term growth
Supplier audits ultimately contribute to a more resilient, reliable supply chain that protects both operations and reputation.
Who conducts a supplier audit?
Supplier audits are typically performed by teams with the right mix of technical knowledge and business insight. Some companies build internal audit teams that specialize in evaluating suppliers against company standards, while others hire third-party auditors for their objectivity and specialized expertise.
However you structure it, effective audits rely on contributors with complementary skills:
- Quality assurance professionals: Understand product quality standards and specifications, spotting potential issues before they escalate
- Procurement specialists: Bring deep knowledge of supply chain management and supplier relationships, and can assess whether contractual requirements are being met
- Subject matter experts: Join as needed depending on the supplier. For example, a food safety expert is invaluable when evaluating a food supplier
Internal vs. external audits
Internal audits are often more cost-effective and can be tailored closely to company standards, but they may lack the objectivity needed to uncover blind spots. External audits bring impartiality, industry expertise, and added credibility with regulators and customers, though they typically require more time and expense. Many companies rely on a mix of both approaches, balancing internal familiarity with external validation to strengthen oversight of their supply base.
Types of supplier audits
Each type of supplier audit targets a different aspect of the supplier relationship. Choosing the right type allows you to focus on the most significant risks and opportunities for improvement instead of running overly broad evaluations.
Type | What is assessed | Ideal for |
---|---|---|
Quality system audit | Quality management system maturity; compliance with standards | Qualifying new suppliers; periodic supplier evaluations |
Process audit | Workflow controls; material handling and storage practices | Evaluating high-risk suppliers; investigating recurring quality issues |
Product audit | Finished goods, labeling, and packaging quality | Launching new products; responding to customer complaints |
Environmental audit | Environmental management systems; waste handling, emissions, sustainability practices | Regulated industries; companies with ESG commitments |
Compliance audit | Adherence to industry regulations; data security and privacy | Highly regulated industries; responding to legislative requirements |
How to choose an audit type
Select an audit type based on your objectives and where risks are greatest:
- A quality system audit is best when you’re concerned about a supplier’s ability to consistently meet specifications and standards
- A process audit makes sense when you need to verify that workflows and methodologies align with your requirements or industry best practices
- Product and compliance audits should be prioritized when your suppliers operate under strict regulations or when their goods directly affect your product’s safety or performance
- An environmental audit is most useful if your industry has sustainability or environmental compliance requirements, or if ESG performance is part of your procurement strategy
Supplier audits can be conducted in different ways, depending on your goals and context:
- Announced audits: Scheduled in advance, giving suppliers time to prepare. Useful for thorough, planned evaluations of systems and processes
- Unannounced audits: Conducted without prior notice, offering a real-time snapshot of everyday practices and uncovering hidden issues
- Desktop audits: Performed remotely by reviewing documentation and records. Helpful for initial assessments, follow-ups, or when site visits aren’t possible
How to conduct a supplier audit, step-by-step
Conducting a supplier audit requires preparation, thorough onsite or remote work, and structured follow-up. The process typically unfolds in five key stages.
1. Prepare and plan
Preparation lays the foundation for a successful evaluation that yields actionable insights while maintaining positive supplier relationships. Choose the audit type and format, assemble a cross-functional team, develop a detailed plan and checklist, communicate expectations to the supplier, and coordinate dates so all relevant parties can participate.
2. Gather information
Strong preparation depends on good data. Review quality manuals, process flows, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and past audit reports. Sending a pre-audit questionnaire helps you target high-risk areas before arriving onsite.
3. Conduct the audit
The audit itself is where you validate how the supplier operates. Begin with a kickoff meeting to set scope and communication methods. Tour the facility to observe conditions and capacity. Interview staff, review records, and capture objective evidence. Wrap up with a closing meeting that shares balanced feedback on both strengths and improvement areas.
4. Analyze findings
After the visit, review all observations carefully. Organize notes and evidence, identify any nonconformances, and compare them against predefined standards. Then assess overall supplier performance, highlighting both compliance and risks that require attention.
5. Report and follow up
The last step ensures issues are resolved and improvements sustained. Create a detailed report with findings and supporting evidence. Share it with the supplier, develop a corrective action plan (CAP) with specific owners and deadlines, and monitor implementation through follow-ups until all items are closed.
Common issues found during a supplier audit
Even with strong preparation, audits often reveal recurring problems. Some are administrative, while others point to deeper risks that demand immediate attention.
Unusual financial discrepancies
Inconsistencies in financial records, unexplained cash flow swings, or sudden changes in expenses without documentation may indicate errors or even fraud. These discrepancies should always be investigated with supporting evidence.
Lack of documentation or incomplete records
Missing or poorly maintained records undermine transparency and make it harder to validate a supplier’s claims. Weak documentation practices also raise questions about internal controls and long-term accountability.
Overly complex or unusual transactions
Complicated or opaque transaction flows can obscure a supplier’s true financial position. They may also signal an attempt to mask risks that require further scrutiny.
High employee turnover in key roles
Frequent turnover in critical positions can destabilize operations and increase the likelihood of quality lapses. It may also point to cultural or leadership issues that warrant closer review.
Inconsistencies between reports and reality
Comparing official documentation with onsite observations often reveals hidden gaps. If reported data doesn’t align with what you see on the ground, it’s a sign that stated policies may not reflect actual practices.
Resistance or lack of cooperation
Delays in providing information, evasive answers, or general unresponsiveness during the audit suggest deeper problems. A lack of transparency is a red flag that should prompt further investigation or corrective action.
How to mitigate a failed supplier audit
A failed audit doesn’t have to end the relationship. Treat it as a remediation project that requires transparency, clear ownership, and sustained follow-up.
- Communicate openly: Share findings in a fact-based, non-accusatory way. Ensure the supplier understands the issues and why resolving them matters for the partnership
- Develop a corrective action plan (CAP): Outline steps for each issue, assign owners, set deadlines, and define measurable outcomes for success
- Set realistic deadlines: Balance urgency with practicality. Quick fixes may be possible, but complex changes often need more time
- Offer support and resources: Provide training, templates, or best practices. Guidance from your team or external experts can accelerate progress
- Conduct follow-up audits: Confirm corrective actions are in place and effective, focusing specifically on previously identified issues
- Consider probationary periods: For critical suppliers, use probation with closer monitoring to underscore seriousness while preserving the relationship
- Document everything: Keep records of reports, communications, and corrective actions to ensure accountability and provide future reference
- Prepare contingency plans: If major issues remain unresolved, identify alternative suppliers or backup processes to minimize disruption
Enhance your procurement process with Ramp
Ramp integrates seamlessly with your procurement operations, providing powerful tools that streamline purchasing and vendor management. With Ramp’s procurement software, you can:
- Centralize purchase requests: Consolidate all procurement requests into a single platform, eliminating the need for email chains or spreadsheets
- Gain real-time spending visibility: Access up-to-date spending data through a unified dashboard, enabling informed decisions about vendor relationships and budget allocation
- Customize approval workflows: Implement tailored approval processes to expedite routine purchases while maintaining appropriate controls and compliance
Explore an interactive demo to see how our procurement solution can enhance your vendor management system.

“Ramp is the only vendor that can service all of our employees across the globe in one unified system. They handle multiple currencies seamlessly, integrate with all of our accounting systems, and thanks to their customizable card and policy controls, we're compliant worldwide.” ”
Brandon Zell
Chief Accounting Officer, Notion

“When our teams need something, they usually need it right away. The more time we can save doing all those tedious tasks, the more time we can dedicate to supporting our student-athletes.”
Sarah Harris
Secretary, The University of Tennessee Athletics Foundation, Inc.

“Ramp had everything we were looking for, and even things we weren't looking for. The policy aspects, that's something I never even dreamed of that a purchasing card program could handle.”
Doug Volesky
Director of Finance, City of Mount Vernon

“Switching from Brex to Ramp wasn’t just a platform swap—it was a strategic upgrade that aligned with our mission to be agile, efficient, and financially savvy.”
Lily Liu
CEO, Piñata

“With Ramp, everything lives in one place. You can click into a vendor and see every transaction, invoice, and contract. That didn’t exist in Zip. It’s made approvals much faster because decision-makers aren’t chasing down information—they have it all at their fingertips.”
Ryan Williams
Manager, Contract and Vendor Management, Advisor360°

“The ability to create flexible parameters, such as allowing bookings up to 25% above market rate, has been really good for us. Plus, having all the information within the same platform is really valuable.”
Caroline Hill
Assistant Controller, Sana Benefits

“More vendors are allowing for discounts now, because they’re seeing the quick payment. That started with Ramp—getting everyone paid on time. We’ll get a 1-2% discount for paying early. That doesn’t sound like a lot, but when you’re dealing with hundreds of millions of dollars, it does add up.”
James Hardy
CFO, SAM Construction Group

“We’ve simplified our workflows while improving accuracy, and we are faster in closing with the help of automation. We could not have achieved this without the solutions Ramp brought to the table.”
Kaustubh Khandelwal
VP of Finance, Poshmark
