2-way matching in accounts payable: What it is and how it works

- What is 2-way matching in accounts payable?
- The 2-way matching process: Step by step
- Why 2-way matching matters for your AP process
- When to use 2-way matching
- Benefits for businesses
- Common challenges and how to overcome them
- Best practices for 2-way matching
- Which invoice matching method should you choose?
- Why select Ramp Bill Pay?

Two-way matching is a simple control in accounts payable: you compare each invoice to its purchase order before you pay it. That quick check reduces errors and keeps vendors confident you’ll pay the right amount on time.
Done well, 2-way matching speeds approvals, prevents duplicate or incorrect payments, and improves the accuracy of your books.
What is 2-way matching in accounts payable?
In accounts payable, 2-way matching compares an invoice to its purchase order to confirm details like quantity, unit price, taxes/fees, and delivery terms all agree. If the invoice matches the PO, it’s approved for payment. If it doesn’t, AP places it on hold and resolves the discrepancy with the vendor.
Example: You order 200 units for $1,000 on a PO. When the invoice arrives for $1,000, AP confirms the quantities and totals match the PO before scheduling payment.
Key components
Two-way matching focuses on verifying critical details across two documents: the purchase order and the vendor invoice. On the PO side, you’ll check item descriptions, quantities, unit prices, and agreed delivery terms. On the invoice side, you’ll confirm that line items, totals, taxes, and payment terms match.
Most companies also set tolerance levels—for example, allowing a 5% price difference or a small quantity variance—before flagging an exception. Together, these criteria ensure the invoice accurately reflects the original order and that mismatches get caught early.
Standardizing these components enables accounts payable teams to quickly identify mismatches, prevent overpayments, and reduce delays in the approval process.
Tolerance levels and variance thresholds
Most AP teams set small variances they’ll allow before flagging an exception. For example:
- Price variance: Up to 5% difference between the PO unit price and the invoice unit price
- Quantity variance: Up to 2 units or 2–3% difference between PO and invoice quantities
- Tax and shipping variance: Charges less than $25 may be accepted without review
Clear thresholds help reduce unnecessary exceptions while still catching material errors or fraud.
The 2-way matching process: Step by step
The 2-way matching process should be a standard part of your AP workflow. Here’s the sequence at a glance:
Purchase order creation and management
The process starts when a buyer creates a purchase order. This document sets the foundation for accurate matching later.
- A buyer initiates a purchase request and generates a purchase order (PO)
- The PO includes item descriptions, quantities, unit prices, and agreed terms
- Vendors review and accept the PO before fulfilling the order
Invoice receipt and processing
Once goods or services are delivered, the vendor sends an invoice that AP logs into the system.
- After shipping goods or delivering services, the vendor issues an invoice
- The AP team receives the invoice (email, portal, or EDI) and enters it into the AP system
- Automation can extract line-item details directly to reduce manual entry errors
The matching process
Next, AP compares the invoice to the purchase order, applying tolerance rules to catch mismatches.
- AP or automation software compares invoice details against the PO
- If documents match within tolerance, the invoice moves forward for payment approval
- If there’s a discrepancy, the system flags it for review and places it on hold until resolution
Example with a tolerance threshold
Here’s how this looks in practice. Suppose you order 500 units at $10 each (PO total: $5,000). The invoice arrives at $10.25 per unit ($5,125 total). With a 5% variance threshold, this 2.5% difference falls within tolerance, so the invoice can proceed. If it exceeded the threshold, you’d flag it for exception handling
Why 2-way matching matters for your AP process
Two-way invoice matching reduces payment errors and invoice fraud and prevents duplicate or incorrect payments. It keeps approvals moving and gives vendors confidence that you’ll pay the right amount on time.
Example: Price discrepancy
Say you’re a builder ordering HVAC units from a trusted vendor that quoted a discount (from $3,000 to $2,700 per unit). The invoice arrives at the undiscounted price. You match the invoice to the PO, spot the variance, and request an updated invoice (or update the PO) before scheduling payment.
Lesson: When you receive an invoice, confirm that price, quantity, taxes, discounts, and the total match the PO before you approve payment.
When to use 2-way matching
Two-way matching is the simplest form of invoice matching and works best for simple, recurring purchases from trusted vendors. Use it for:
- Recurring software subscriptions or maintenance services
- Utilities and other predictable monthly charges tied to a standing PO
- Consumables and office supplies replenished on a regular cadence
- Low-risk services from established vendors with stable pricing
Benefits for businesses
Two-way matching improves invoice accuracy and speeds approvals by confirming the invoice matches the purchase order before payment. It reduces rework, strengthens vendor trust, and keeps your records clean.
Two-way matching enables you to:
- Prevent overpayments and duplicates by catching price, quantity, and total mismatches early
- Speed approvals by reducing exceptions and manual follow-ups
- Improve data quality and audit readiness with consistent PO-to-invoice verification
- Strengthen vendor relationships through accurate, on-time payments
- Protect cash and forecasting by preventing leakage from incorrect or duplicate payments
Common challenges and how to overcome them
Even though 2-way matching is straightforward, teams often hit friction from systems, data, or process gaps. Address these early to keep AP efficient:
Challenge | Why it happens | Solution |
---|---|---|
System integration issues | PO and invoice data live in separate systems, forcing manual re-entry and increasing errors | Use AP automation that syncs directly with your ERP |
Data quality problems | Inconsistent item codes, missing PO numbers, or vendor errors prevent a clean match | Standardize item/PO fields and implement validation checks |
Automation limitations | Legacy AP tools lack tolerance thresholds or exception routing | Upgrade to platforms with configurable rules and routing |
Change management resistance | Employees view 2-way matching as extra work without clear benefits | Train teams on how matching prevents errors and saves time |
Training requirements | Staff aren’t sure what to escalate vs what’s within tolerance | Document variance thresholds and clear escalation workflows |
Exception handling bottlenecks | Too many invoices are flagged due to tight tolerances or unclear routing | Set realistic thresholds and create routing rules to resolve exceptions faster |
Best practices for 2-way matching
A consistent set of rules, light automation, and clear exception paths keep 2-way matching fast and accurate. Use the practices below to minimize errors and speed approvals.
Setting up your 2-way match process
Start by defining matching rules and tolerances—say, allowing a 5% price variance or up to a $50 total difference. Then, set approval hierarchies that clarify which invoices can move forward automatically and which require manager sign-off. Finally, outline exception workflows so your team knows exactly how to handle mismatches, including escalation paths and vendor communication.
Automation and technology considerations
Automation makes two-way matching faster and more reliable. The best AP platforms combine OCR or e-invoicing, line-level matching, and real-time ERP syncing so purchase orders and invoices flow seamlessly together. Modern systems also apply AI and machine learning to flag anomalies, suggest general ledger (GL) coding, and learn from prior resolutions to reduce repetitive work.

Two-way matching is the simplest form of invoice matching, while 3-way matching adds an additional layer of verification. Both aim to confirm invoices are correct before payment, but 3-way matching provides more assurance by verifying that goods or services were actually received.
For example, a coffee shop that regularly orders beans from the same vendor can safely use 2-way matching for those low-risk, recurring purchases. But for a one-off or high-value purchase, like an espresso machine or custom merchandise, that same shop would turn to 3-way matching for added assurance.
4-way matching
Four-way matching builds on 3-way matching by adding a quality inspection report to the PO, invoice, and receiving report. It’s most useful for custom or regulated items where quality must be verified before payment.
Comparison table
Here’s how 2-way, 3-way, and 4-way matching compare across documents, use cases, and tradeoffs:
Matching type | Documents compared | Best for | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|---|
2-way | Purchase order (PO) and invoice | Recurring, low-risk purchases | Fast; less resource-intensive | Lower assurance; may miss delivery issues |
3-way | PO, invoice, and receiving report | One-off or high-value purchases | Greater accuracy; verifies delivery | Slower; requires more documentation |
4-way | PO, invoice, receiving report, and quality inspection report | Custom or regulated items | Maximum assurance; enforces quality compliance | Slowest; highest documentation burden; can delay payment |
Which invoice matching method should you choose?
The more matching checks you make, the more accurate your AP process will be. But keep in mind that more matching requires more resources from your AP department. As a business owner, you must determine whether the benefits of performing more checks are worth the additional cost and effort. Choose the level that fits your risk, spend, and process maturity.
- Internal controls: If AP controls are strong (role-based approvals, audit trails), 2-way matching may be sufficient for lower-risk spend
- Procurement complexity: If your purchasing process is complex or highly regulated, favor 3-way matching to add proof of receipt
- Purchase value and risk: Use 2-way for low-value, low-risk purchases; use 3-way for high-value, inventory-backed, or compliance-sensitive purchases
- Recurrence: For recurring services and predictable supplies from trusted vendors, 2-way matching typically works well
- System support: If your AP system supports tolerance thresholds, exception routing, and visibility, you can safely lean on 2-way for eligible categories. Otherwise consider 3-way or adopt invoice management software to help.
How Ramp Bill Pay is the best way to simplify every step of accounts payable
Ramp Bill Pay is accounts payable automation software designed to address the core obstacles in AP. From invoice ingestion and line-item extraction to payment scheduling and reconciliations, Ramp captures invoice information, routes approvals, and integrates with your ERP—helping your team finalize your books with greater speed and fewer manual steps.
While traditional AP tools often struggle with cumbersome ERP connections, inconsistent purchase order validation, and fragmented workflows, Ramp Bill Pay automates the entire AP process with precision, flexibility, and transparency. We’ve engineered Ramp for oversight and control, from the first touchpoint to the last payment.
Ramp is recognized as one of the easiest AP software offerings to use based on G2 reviews (as of June 5, 2025). With over 2,000 reviews and an average 4.8/5 star rating, finance teams across industries rely on Ramp to minimize repetitive tasks, prevent costly errors, and keep their records accurate. One G2 user even called Ramp the best way to manage business finances.
Common AP workflow pitfalls and how Ramp overcomes them
Most accounts payable processes encounter bottlenecks in these areas:
- Chasing down approvals that get lost in email threads
- Reconciling invoices that don’t match purchase orders
- Entering data manually into disconnected finance systems
Ramp Bill Pay streamlines these steps with comprehensive AP features:
- Automated 2-way matching between purchase orders and invoices
- Recurring payment scheduling and detailed vendor tracking
- Real-time ERP synchronization with platforms such as NetSuite, QuickBooks, and Xero
- Advanced GL coding suggestions and AI-driven OCR invoice processing
- Centralized controls spanning procurement, AP, and expense management
- Customizable approval chains with smart routing and user roles
- Flexible support for ACH, card, checks, and international or domestic wire payments
Businesses from diverse industries searching for top-tier AP solutions have turned to Ramp for its reliability and intuitive design. For example:
- Skin Pharm shortened its approval cycles from weeks to just 48 hours
- The Second City processed bills 2x faster with accurate OCR
- Mix Talent reduced AP processing time to only 15 minutes after switching from BILL
Why select Ramp Bill Pay?
Ramp Bill Pay sets the benchmark for what modern AP software should achieve. With advanced automation, robust integrations, and workflows that put finance teams in control, Ramp empowers organizations to move faster and operate with greater assurance. Ramp’s AP software features a free entry-level tier, mid-tier pricing at $15 per user/month, and custom solutions for enterprises. Experience how AP can work smarter. Get started with Ramp Bill Pay.

“Ramp is the only vendor that can service all of our employees across the globe in one unified system. They handle multiple currencies seamlessly, integrate with all of our accounting systems, and thanks to their customizable card and policy controls, we're compliant worldwide.” ”
Brandon Zell
Chief Accounting Officer, Notion

“When our teams need something, they usually need it right away. The more time we can save doing all those tedious tasks, the more time we can dedicate to supporting our student-athletes.”
Sarah Harris
Secretary, The University of Tennessee Athletics Foundation, Inc.

“Ramp had everything we were looking for, and even things we weren't looking for. The policy aspects, that's something I never even dreamed of that a purchasing card program could handle.”
Doug Volesky
Director of Finance, City of Mount Vernon

“Switching from Brex to Ramp wasn’t just a platform swap—it was a strategic upgrade that aligned with our mission to be agile, efficient, and financially savvy.”
Lily Liu
CEO, Piñata

“With Ramp, everything lives in one place. You can click into a vendor and see every transaction, invoice, and contract. That didn’t exist in Zip. It’s made approvals much faster because decision-makers aren’t chasing down information—they have it all at their fingertips.”
Ryan Williams
Manager, Contract and Vendor Management, Advisor360°

“The ability to create flexible parameters, such as allowing bookings up to 25% above market rate, has been really good for us. Plus, having all the information within the same platform is really valuable.”
Caroline Hill
Assistant Controller, Sana Benefits

“More vendors are allowing for discounts now, because they’re seeing the quick payment. That started with Ramp—getting everyone paid on time. We’ll get a 1-2% discount for paying early. That doesn’t sound like a lot, but when you’re dealing with hundreds of millions of dollars, it does add up.”
James Hardy
CFO, SAM Construction Group

“We’ve simplified our workflows while improving accuracy, and we are faster in closing with the help of automation. We could not have achieved this without the solutions Ramp brought to the table.”
Kaustubh Khandelwal
VP of Finance, Poshmark
